DrDarkEnergy (January 8th, 2009 @ 11:36 am)

Collision energies and bombs: Several eV chemical bomb; Several MeV nuclear bomb; Several TeV hyper bomb. (Example: SN 1987A) Chemical bomb - change in chemical structure of matter. Nuclear bomb - change in nuclear structure of matter. Hyper bomb - transformation of matter into field mc^2 --- > LI^2. Magnetic trap is 10^36 times stronger than black hole. LHC propagandists must be arrested. Otherwise they will explode the Earth. Stop Tevatron and LHC.

bidasebidas (January 7th, 2009 @ 4:48 pm)

This machine will open the gates of hell AHAHAHAH!

colinleddy (January 5th, 2009 @ 3:32 am)

Super hard, yet not impossible? Comparable to the odds of our exact existence? Interesting hm?

colinleddy (January 5th, 2009 @ 3:30 am)

Which is obviously the reason you're currently working for CERN under their procedures and guesstimated problems department, right?

rubut (January 4th, 2009 @ 7:10 pm)

well we've only got one life and I certainly wouldnt risk it for an almost impossible

rubut (January 4th, 2009 @ 7:07 pm)

cant I just watch videos like these on youtube without reading religious fanatics commenting and expecting hatred as a reply... damnit! Im sick of the world. Keep you religious beliefs to yourself.

Aaberg123 (January 3rd, 2009 @ 12:40 am)

"... and we'll be forced to start looking again." Exactly, and that's what makes the LHC great.

DrDarkEnergy (January 2nd, 2009 @ 4:47 pm)

Arrant big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. Magnetic trap is 10^36 times stronger than black hole. Open the criminal cases against global terrorists. Stop Tevatron and LHC. People, do something: write letters to authorities, to prosecutors departments, to presidents. Nobody will save you, if you will sit silently, if you will not stop crazy hep-physicists.

g4truth7 (January 1st, 2009 @ 8:01 am)

4:37 if you dont think Jesus is coming back your nuts.Man always kills.

ytmoog (January 1st, 2009 @ 1:21 am)

"Yes well, nature has a funny way of 'ensuring' the odds of 'almost impossible'. " Well, if you win the lottery every week for a few years I would be greatly interested in hearing from you. As long as you don't fall through the ground into the centre of the earth before you claim your winnings.

onepartofone (December 31st, 2008 @ 10:45 am)

well, what can i say? i never liked using a theory to establish another theory, then try to prove the latter, using the former as a basis for a prove, however forgetting that the former is just another theory. we are in the field of more theoretical, rather than experimental physics. LHC may give us answers, even if the answer is 'No' to all that has been done so far... and we'll be forced to start looking again.

ytmoog (December 31st, 2008 @ 9:02 am)

"Hawking radiation is not proven yet." This is a bit of a red herring. The hypothesis which suggests that black holes might be produced at these energies (called M Theory) is based to a great extent on Hawking Radiation. If Hawking was wrong then M Theory is neatly chopped off at the knees and the LHC cannot possibly produce 'tiny' black holes.